Action Engineering v. Martin Marietta Aluminum
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from a judgment for the plaintiff, Action Engineering (“Action”), in a suit against Martin Marietta Aluminum (“MMA”) for wrongful termination of a construction contract. The District Court of the Virgin Islands applied a “reasonableness” standard in deciding whether MMA’s termination of the contract before completion was within its contractual rights to terminate “[i]f in Owner’s [MMA’s] opinion, contractor [Action] fails to carry on the work diligently and on schedule.” Because we conclude that the district court should…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Varlack v. SWC Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- American Air Filter Company, Inc. v. Michael J. McNichol C/o John F. Scanlan, Inc. And John F. Scanlan, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Bleecher v. ConteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- General Engineering Corporation v. Martin Marietta Alumina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Morin Building Products Company, Inc. v. Baystone Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Holland Loader Co. v. Flsmidth A/SDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Misano Di Navigazione, Spa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Kelvin Manbodh Asbestos Litigation Series v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.