Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Schimmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 22, 1983, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. 1 At issue on this appeal is whether the Board’s decision that claimant lost his employment through misconduct in connection therewith, based upon a finding that claimant fought with a coworker, must be reversed since the record contains a prior determination restoring the co-worker’s benefits upon a finding that while a “shouting match” had occurred, there had been no fight. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Claim of RanniNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People ex rel. Guido v. CalkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. In re the Claim of SmaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FerrarieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re the Claim of BaijuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Engel v. Calgon Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. In re the Claims of BullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API