Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hutchinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 1962No. 39319PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

The first special ground of the motion for new trial assigns error on the following excerpt from the court’s charge to the jury: “Now I charge you that if you should determine that the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict for damages on account of defendant’s negligence, if you find there is any and that there was no accident on behalf of the defendant, the measure of those damages would be on account of pain and suffering, mental and physical, reasonably and proximately resulting from such injuries and which would extend into the future.” One of the contentions of the movant is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Central Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Everett v. CleggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Investors Syndicate v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Teague v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Earl v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Brown v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. McKinney v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Davis v. ATLANTA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Gober v. Atlanta Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API