Healey v. Wipf
South Dakota Supreme Court
Mandamus by William Healey and others to compel D .D. Wipf, as Secretary of State, to receive and file certain nomination certificates of Democratic candidates and to- certify their names to the auditors of the several counties, that ’such names may be printed on the official ballots to be voted at the November, 1908, general election.
1Opinion of the CourtHaney, P. J.
This original special proceeding was instituted to compel the defendant, as Secretary of State, to receive and file nomination certificates of certain Democratic party candidates, and to certify the names of such candidates to the auditors of the several counties for the purpose of having them printed on the official ballots to be voted at the coming general election, in accordance .with the provisions of article 6, c. 19, Rev. Pol. Code. It appears from the application that the Democratic Party is an organized political party that has participated in state, county, township, and municipal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Coffey v. Democratic General CommitteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Britton v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Morrow v. WipfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Howells v. MetcalfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by21 opinions
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Ledgerwood v. PittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Riter v. DouglassNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Shepard v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.