Legal Opinion

Carvalho v. HP, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 20, 2022No. 5:21-cv-08015Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 RODNEY CARVALHO, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08015-BLF 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 10 HP, INC., COMPLAINT 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 46] 12 13 In this case, Plaintiffs Rodney Carvalho and Mark Maher challenge the manner in which 14 Defendant HP Inc. advertises products on its website. Plaintiffs allege that HP displays false and 15 inflated “strikethrough” prices for its products that it then offers to consumers at a purported 16 “discount…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API