Pierro v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, Hicks, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The decision upon a former appeal in this action is reported in 37 Minn. 314, (34 N. W. Rep. 38.) After a new trial and a verdict for the defendant, the plaintiff has appealed from an order refusing another new trial. The cause of action here asserted is trespass upon an injury to a strip of land 62 feet in width, consisting of the westerly 22 feet of several lots in Bottineau’s second addition to Minneapolis, with the adjacent 40 feet, comprising that half of Main street upon which such lots abut. The street had not been opened to public travel, as is alleged, and the plaintiff had inclosed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Farrington v. PayneNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Herriter v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- McCaffrey v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Memmer v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Roby v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.