Legal Opinion

Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railway & Iron Co. v. McCann

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Gogebic. (Daboll, J., presiding.) Bill to restrain the removal of certain mining machinery attached to leased premises. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The complainant is the owner in fee of a

certain parcel of land in Gogebic county, upon which is a mining location, containing buildings, machinery, etc., for the purpose of mining iron ore. This mine was formerly known as the “First National Iron Mine,” and was equipped and worked as such.

The bill of complaint alleged that, among the buildings and fixtures oü said mining location, and attached to the land, and a part thereof, and belonging to complainant, was an engine and boiler house, containing a boiler and engine and hoisting machinery, set in masonry and firmly attached to the land,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manwaring v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Booth v. OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Broaddus v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. American Clay Machinery Co. v. Sedalia Brick & Tile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Reader v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Brown v. Reno Electric Light & Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  5. Reader v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API