Legal Opinion

Booth v. Oliver

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Delta. (G'nnt, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover possession of a planer and other machinery in a planing-mill in the city of Escanaba, in Delta county.

The defendant is one of the lessors of the mill, and the plaintiffs claim the property by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by Harris Brothers, the lessees of the mill.

On the first day of March, 1878, Nelson Ludington and others executed and delivered to the defendant,- John F. Oliver, and Frederick O. Clark, a paid-up lease for the term *665of seven years of the premises upon which said planing-mill was sduated. The lease contained an agreement that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railway & Iron Co. v. McCannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Morris v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Williams v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API