Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Florio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 23, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as a customer assistant for Sears Roebuck & Company until December 14, 2006. Her ensuing application for unemployment insurance benefits was ultimately denied by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. Our review of the hearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API