Legal Opinion
Preston v. Preston
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1919No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Newaygo; Barton, J. Bill by Nettie Preston against Shinar Preston and others -for the reformation of a deed. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
An appeal is taken from the following decree, which sufficiently sets forth facts for a proper understanding of the case here presented to us:
“This cause having come on to be heard upon the pleadings and proofs taken therein, the proofs having been taken in open court as in a suit at law, and having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, and the court having had the same under advisement and having duly considered the same, doth find:
“1st. That Nettie Preston, the complainant, is the daughter of Shinar Preston and Eugenia Preston, now deceased, and that for a great many years the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Ruch v. RuchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Pike v. PikeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Friend v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
- Brown v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Smith v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Bresee v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.