Legal Opinion

Preston v. Preston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Newaygo; Barton, J. Bill by Nettie Preston against Shinar Preston and others -for the reformation of a deed. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

An appeal is taken from the following decree, which sufficiently sets forth facts for a proper understanding of the case here presented to us:

“This cause having come on to be heard upon the pleadings and proofs taken therein, the proofs having been taken in open court as in a suit at law, and having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, and the court having had the same under advisement and having duly considered the same, doth find:
“1st. That Nettie Preston, the complainant, is the daughter of Shinar Preston and Eugenia Preston, now deceased, and that for a great many years the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ruch v. RuchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Pike v. PikeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Friend v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
  2. Brown v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Smith v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Bresee v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API