Legal Opinion

Steele v. Dye

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1909No. 16,136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wallace district court; Jacob C. Ruppenthal, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

John T. Steele, having possession of a tract of land under a compromise tax deed more than five years old, brought an action to quiet his title. Charlotte A. Dye, one of the defendants, answered claiming title in herself, alleging the invalidity of the tax deed upon various grounds, and asking that it be set aside and that she be given possession of the property. A stipulation was filed providing that the case should be submitted upon certain agreed facts. The plaintiff’s cause of action upon his petition was then, upon his request, dismissed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dubois v. HepburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Larkin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Pugsley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Tucker v. ShorbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BeersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Banchor v. ProctorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API