Legal Opinion

Banchor v. Proctor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1913No. 17,889; No. 18,118; No. 18,119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Gove district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The actions in which these appeals were taken were instituted by the holders of rival tax titles to the land in controversy.

The original title was vested in Adelaide S. Alden, who died in 1902. Neither she nor her heirs ever held actual possession. In February, 1903, a tax deed, regular on its face, but based on irregular proceedings, was issued to Marion Proctor and was duly recorded. In September, 1906, another tax deed was issued to Franklin Banchor and was duly recorded. This deed was good on its face, but was voidable for a number of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Horner v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Cone v. UsherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Lockwood v. Meade Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Buckner v. WingardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Steele v. DyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BeersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Elmore v. FanningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Thiessen v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Cain v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Hetzer v. BurberySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API