Legal Opinion
Reichert Towing Line, Inc. v. Long Island Machine & Marine Const. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARVIN, District Judge.
Libelant brought an action in admiralty against the respondent fdr damages caused’ by the latter’s failure to deliver a cylinder which it was to build and install in the tug Joseph C. Reichert within 5 weeks from the arrival of the tug at the respondent’s plant. The libel sets forth that the cylinder was installed some months after the agreed time, and that as soon as the tug was put in operation the cylinder burst; that the respondent agreed to install a new cylinder in place thereof within 26 days, but delayed so doing for a further period of several months. Damages…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The ElectronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1891
- The GoyazDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- The VenezuelaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Armour & Co. v. Fort Morgan Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Linen Thread Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
- Capital Transportation Corporation v. ThelningDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1958
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Harbor Side Trading & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.