Legal Opinion

Capital Transportation Corporation v. Thelning

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided November 14, 1958No. 1086PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge (sitting by designation).

This is a suit in admiralty brought by the libellant against the libellee Thelning alleging that the libellee failed to make certain repairs properly to a tug.

The libellee Thelning seeks to bring in the Sumter Machinery Company, a South Carolina corporation, under Admiralty rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A., by alleging that the materials for the bearings in the engines had been furnished and poured and the bearings re-babbitted by the Sumter Machinery Company.

' The Sumter Machinery Company has filed exceptions to the petition that it be impleaded on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Reichert Towing Line, Inc. v. Long Island Machine & Marine Const. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Houston-New Orleans, Inc. v. Page Engineering CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
  2. McCann v. Falgout Boat Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  3. Oroco Marine, Inc. v. National Marine Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
  4. Young v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API