Legal Opinion

United States v. Earl Holding Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1950No. Civ. No. 3200PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

The parties have stipulated to the material facts. In July, 1947, a house in Minneapolis was rented under a lease running from September 1, 1947, to September 1, 1948, for a rental price of $100 per month. Under the lease, the tenant was granted an option to renew the lease for two one-year periods. The tenant exercised the option right, and the lease has been extended to, and is in force until, September 1, 1950. Defendants now own that house and possess the rights and obligations of a landlord under the lease.

The Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fleming v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Cobleigh v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
  5. Porter v. ShibeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. FriedmanDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
  2. Abbate v. HerbruckCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  3. Probst v. NoblesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. Scerbo v. CondroUnited States District Court · 1957
  5. Stevick v. Cowan & Cowan, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API