Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided October 1, 1998No. 97-0435; Crim.App. No. 9401494PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*449 Opinion of the Court

COX, Chief Judge:

The issues before us involve the admissibility of eyewitness-identification expert-opinion evidence. At trial, appellant requested an expert in the field of eyewitness identification, and the military judge denied it. The Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that the military judge erred, at least in part. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that at least some of the expert’s testimony, as proffered by the defense, was admissible and should have been received. Testing for prejudice, the Court of Criminal Appeals concluded, nonetheless, that appellant was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BlaneyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  2. United States v. DimberioUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API