Legal Opinion

Wray v. Deters

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1996No. C-950512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

I. Facts

Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) appropriated a portion of defendants-appellees Donald and Linda Deters’s backyard for a permanent easement for a sewer line and a temporary easement to install the sewer line. The property is the residence of the Deterses and their young children. The relocation of the sewer line was necessitated by nearby construction of the cross-county highway, now the Ronald Reagan Highway. 1 The only issue was the amount of compensation for the taking. The permanent easement consisted of 975 square feet adjacent to the Deterses’ home. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myers v. GarsonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bekos v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Krosky v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hurst v. StarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haney v. Barringer, 06 Ma 141 (12-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Banford v. Aldrich Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Wray v. Allied Industrial Development Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Cincinnati v. GilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API