Legal Opinion
Schindler v. Southern Coach Lines, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1949PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubnett
We adopt from a memo opinion of Mr. Justice Tom-linson, used in conference on the petition for certiorari, the following:
“Maud K. Schindler commenced this action to recover damages for injuries received as a result of alleged negligence upon the part of the Southern Coach Lines, Inc. Her husband instituted a companion suit to recover loss of services. The two cases were tried together.
“The Circuit Judge overruled the motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, saying that he wanted to hear what the defendant had to say about how this accident occurred. The motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frank v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Philip Carey Roofing & Manufacturing Co. v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Jackson v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Louvier v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Underwood v. Waterslides of Mid-America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Mrs. Fletcher Harvey Jenkins, Administratrix v. Associated Transport, Inc., Frank L. Whaley v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- City of Chattanooga v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Little v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.