Legal Opinion

Louvier v. City of Nashville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 29, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

This is a suit for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff,’ Margaret Lovier, alleged to have been caused by a fall at a street crossing, by reason of stepping into a hole in said crossing, allowed to exist by the negligence of the defendant city. Mrs. Margaret Lovier sued for $5000 for injuries sustained, and her husband, John L. Lovier, sued for $1000 for loss of services, doctors’ bills and other expenses incurred by him by reason of his wife’s injuries. The cases were tried together, by consent, before a jury, being tried as a single case, and resulting in a single record.

The jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dale v. Continental InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stewart v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Poole v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Oliver v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Warfield v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Schindler v. Southern Coach Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Batts v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  4. Broome v. Parkview, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  5. Jackson v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API