Legal Opinion
Toro Co. v. Krouse, Kern & Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 1, 1986No. Civ. F 85-517PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Krouse, Kern & Company, Inc. and K. Paul Kauffman (Krouse). Plaintiffs Toro Company and Toro Credit Company (Toro) have responded to the motion, and Krouse has filed a reply. The court heard oral argument on July 23, 1986. For the reasons which follow, Krouse’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
Under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment may only be granted if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Milo John Munson v. Wendell R. Friske, John Rybak, Jr., Kenneth Todd, and Ashland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Ackerman v. SchwartzDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.