Legal Opinion

Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1984No. 18404, 18511PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

These consolidated appeals arise out of an action commenced by Prowswood Corporation (hereinafter “Prowswood”) against Mountain Fuel Supply Company (hereinafter “Mountain Fuel”) for damages resulting from the alleged breach of an oral contract and the alleged negligent misrepresentation made in connection with the promotion and sale of gas air conditioning. Following a dismissal of the action with prejudice, Prowswood filed an appeal based on the following contentions: (1) the lower court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute the action in the name of the real party in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  5. Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Pneumo Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Serrato v. Utah Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  4. Salt Lake County v. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. BowersUtah Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API