Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1934No. Civ. 5137PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff in this action had judgment against the defendant for and on account of a certain life insurance policy issued by the defendant upon the life of her husband, Charles C. Metcalf. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

On March 14, 1921, the insurance company issued its policy to Charles C. Metcalf, whereby it promised to pay to respondent, as beneficiary, upon proof of death of Charles C. Metcalf, $1,000, less any indebtedness existing against said policy, in consideration of the application and the payment of a quarterly premium of $14.28, on the fourteenth day of every March,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Veal v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. State Mutual Life Insurance v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Nielsen v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Henricks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Afro-American Life Insurance v. LaBerthSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Orcutt v. FerraniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API