Legal Opinion

Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of Columbus

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2005No. 03-4252PublishedCited by 343 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Hazel Golden appeals the judgment below, in which the district court: (1) granted summary judgment to Defendants the City of Columbus, Ohio, and the City’s Director of Public Utilities, Cheryl Roberto 1 (collectively the “City”) on Golden’s claims that the City’s denial of water service to tenants whose predecessors left delinquent water accounts at the premises violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691 et seq. (the “ECOA”); (2) dismissed Golden’s claim that the same constitutes a…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by343 opinions

  1. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Lambert v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Richard Wesley v. Alison CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. Young v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API