Welch v. . Welch
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The appeal raises the two questions whether the clerk’s judgment was void or irregular and if irregular whether the appellant was an innocent purchaser for value without notice.
Under the practice which prevailed before 1868 a judgment in a special proceeding would not be set aside upon the application of a minor who had not been served with process if a guardian ad litem had been appointed to defend his interests and in good faith had made a defense in his behalf. Hare v. Hollomon, 94 N. C., 14. It was the general practice, loose as it was common, to apply for the appointment of a guardian ad…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Sutton v. . SchonwaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Matthews v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Williamson v. . HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Graham v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Travis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Narron v. MusgraveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.