People v. Gonzales
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
We are asked herein to render an advisory opinion upon the question of whether or not article 2, § 10 of the Michigan Constitution (1908), as amended (1952), is repugnant to the Federal Constitution. There is no constitutional authority for this Court to render advisory opinions; nor does this case require our answer to the question posed.
The amendment under attack is as follows:
“The person, houses, papers, and possessions of every person shall be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place or to seize any person or things shall issue without describing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. GonzalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Cochrane v. Mesick Consolidated School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. WilcoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rozankovich v. KALAMAZOO SPRING CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.