Cochrane v. Mesick Consolidated School District Board of Education
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
(for reversal). The attorney general intervened and appeals from a decision of the trial court holding that defendant school district did not violate the statute guaranteeing to all students an equal right to public educational facilities by excluding married high school students from participation in “co-curricular activities.”
Intervenor and appellant states:
“The attorney general, in the exercise of his duty, respectfully requests the Supreme Court to provide an authoritative determination of the questions referred to, and takes the initiative in this appeal for the purpose of resolving…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Parker v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- McCain v. YostTexas Supreme Court · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Raike Ex Rel. MinnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Board of Directors of Independent School District v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Starkey v. Board of Education of Davis County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Hiers v. Detroit Superintendent of SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.