Legal Opinion
Kang Joo Kwan v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 11, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-181PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of the defendant, the United States of America (“United States”), to dismiss (Document No. 13) and the response of the plaintiffs thereto. Also before the Court is the motion of defendant for a protective Order (Document No. 23) and the motion of the plaintiffs for leave to file and correct their memorandum of law (Document No. 21). The United States seeks to dismiss this lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), arguing that the plaintiffs lack standing and that the claims are not…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stanziale v. Pepper Hamilton LLP (In Re Student Finance Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Lewis Ex Rel. Young v. RendellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Kang Joo Kwan and Se Jeik Park v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Affymetrix, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006