Kang Joo Kwan and Se Jeik Park v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Kang Joo Kwan, for himself and as representative of Korean veterans of the Vietnam conflict, and Se Jeik Park, for 270 members of the Korean National Assembly, seek payment by the United States of moneys asserted to have been promised to Korean veterans of the Vietnam conflict but not paid. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that Messrs. Kwan and Park lack standing to enforce a government-to-government obligation, and that their claims are nonjusticiable political questions. 1 We affirm that decision. The district court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- De Archibold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Cruz v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Ory Eshel v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- De Archibold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.