Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Epstein
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 7, 1953No. 10888_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
The Board seeks enforcement of its order of January 29, 1952, requiring respondents, Harry Epstein, Irving Epstein, and Lena Epstein, co-partners, d/b/a Top Mode Manufacturing Company, to bargain with Local 108 of the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union and granting other related relief. 1
After an unpleasant experience with a Philadelphia local of the same International Union, which resulted in the respondents’ discontinuance of their operations there, the firm opened a plant for the manufacturing of women’s dresses at Dauphin, Pa., about August 1, 1949. Within…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Philamon Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Carlisle Paper Box Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Edward Fields, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gotham Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.