Legal Opinion
Merola v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 29, 1975No. 74-1628PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
This case is before us for the second time on the sole question of an appropriate award of attorneys’ fees following the settlement of an antitrust action. The first appeal, 493 F.2d 292 (3rd Cir. 1974), resulted in remand of the case in order that the district court might reconsider its award of $5,000 plus expenses in light of this court’s decision in Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 487 F.2d 161 (3rd Cir. 1973) [hereinafter Lindy], After remand, the district court reaffirmed its award of $5,000 and this appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Monaghan v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Powell v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Mencher v. SachsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.