Legal Opinion
Salmon v. City of Stuart, Fla.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1952No. 13644PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal is from an order, dated October IT, 1950, dismissing the cause, under Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for want of prosecution, and an order dated February 26, 1951, denying her petition to vacate the order and reinstate the cause.
Confronted by a motion to dismiss the appeal because not timely taken,, in that the order of dismissal was entered on October 11, 1950, and the notice of appeal was filed March 15, 1951, more than 150 days afterward, while the order denying the motion to vacate was not appealable, Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co., 9 Cir., 115…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Cromelin v. MarkwalterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Partridge v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. MuschanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Johnny B. McGOWAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAULKNER CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Delta Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.