Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
Before the Court are fully briefed cross-motions for summary judgment.1 For the reasons set forth herein, defendant’s motion (Doc. No. 172) is GRANTED; plaintiffs motion (Doc. No. 193) is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Ware-housemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 377 (“plaintiff’ or “Local 377”) is a labor organization affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“Teamsters”). Local 377 was the collective bargaining representative for certain employees of defendant Shelly & Sands, Inc. (“defendant” or “Shelly &…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stingle v. Ascent Resources-Utica, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026