Legal Opinion
In re Krull
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 3, 1937No. 9646PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is a petition to review a report of the special master' recommending that an order restraining a mortgage creditor from foreclosing on the mortgage be made permanent.
In 1932 the debtor executed a bond and mortgage for the principal sum of $2,700 in favor of Michael Kieda. The debtor defaulted on the mortgage, and in January, -1937, judgment was entered on the bond accompanying the mortgage. A fi. fa. was issued on the judgment and the debtor’s property was advertised for sale. On September 1, 1937, prior to the sale, the debtor filed his petition for an extension…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sorenson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Collins v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- In Re FaourCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Mellin v. MonsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- In re MunsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Mid-Jersey National Bank v. Fidelity-Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Power-Pak Products, Inc. v. Royal-Globe InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1977
- Mid-Jersey National Bank v. Fidelity-Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975