Legal Opinion
Pena v. Mines
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1995No. 15586PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
Employer appeals the compensation order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarding Worker temporary total disability benefits. Employer raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the WCJ erred in rejecting Employer’s false application defense; and (2) whether the WCJ erred by not apportioning liability for Worker’s benefits between Employer and Worker’s prior employer. We affirm.
FACTS
Because Employer does not challenge the WCJ’s findings of fact, we are bound by those findings on appeal. See Stueber v. Pickard, 112 N.M. 489, 491, 816 P.2d 1111, 1113 (1991)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- V.P. Clarence Co. v. ColgateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Roswell Independent SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Stueber v. PickardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tom Growney Equipment Co. v. JouettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Ortiz v. BTU Block & Concrete Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Gutierrez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Buckingham v. Health South Rehabilitation HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Buckingham v. Health South Rehabilitation HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.