Legal Opinion

Seven Star, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1989No. 88-5525PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellants are the owners of five ballrooms in Los Angeles that employ workers from Mexico and Central America as dance hostesses. The plaintiffs originally applied to the Department of Labor (DOL) for alien employment certification to obtain H-2 temporary worker visas for their hostesses, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii) & 1184(c) and 20 C.F.R. § 655.101. After the DOL denied the visas, the plaintiffs resubmitted their applications to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Los Angeles district office pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 214.2. They…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrija Artukovic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. ARTEE COPORATIONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
  3. Sussex Engineering, Ltd. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mester Manufacturing Company v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Roma Outdoor Creations, Inc. v. City of CummingDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  3. Seven Star, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Herro v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Blumenfeld v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API