Legal Opinion

Herro v. City of Milwaukee

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 5, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 91-C-756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.

In his amended complaint, filed August 19, 1991, plaintiff Bernard Herró (“Herró”) claims that defendants, the City of Milwaukee and several of its alderpersons, denied him equal protection of the laws by rejecting his application for a tavern license for certain premises nine months before granting a tavern license for the same premises to another person. These actions are said to have violated both the Fourteenth Amendment and Article I, Section 1, of the Wisconsin Constitution.

On July 30, 1991, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. John A. Reed, Gerald G. Kaluzny, and Rbk, Ltd. v. Village of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernard L. Herro v. City of Milwaukee, Thomas C. Nardelli, Paul A. Henningsen, Donald F. Richards, and Annette ScherbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Birck v. County of WalworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API