Legal Opinion

Blumenfeld v. Attorney General of the United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 16, 1991No. Civ. H-90-474 (PCD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

This is an action for review, under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 703, 704, of the denial of a visa petition filed by plaintiffs on behalf of a citizen of the United Kingdom. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment, under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) and compelling defendants to approve their H-2 non-immigrant visa petition for the temporary employment of an alien as an “au pair” (child monitor). The parties’ cross-move…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meaning of "Temporary" Work Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b), Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API