Legal Opinion

Fordham v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 1, 2020No. 121410Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 121,410 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CHAD FORDHAM, Appellant, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Johnson District Court; JAMES F. VANO, judge. Opinion filed May 1, 2020. Affirmed. Tricia A. Bath, of Bath & Edmonds, P.A., of Overland Park, for appellant. Donald J. Cooper, of Legal Services, Kansas Department of Revenue, for appellee. Before HILL, P.J., BUSER and BRUNS, JJ. PER CURIAM: Chad Fordham appeals from the district court's decision affirming the administrative suspension of his driver's…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Barnhart v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. State v. NeceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API