Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 23, 1988No. 3-88-00014, 3-88-00036, 3-88-00003, 3-88-00038, 3-87-00169 and 3-87-00160PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Defendants in the above-captioned cases have moved for an order declaring invalid and unenforceable the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Sentencing Guidelines” or “Guidelines”) promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission (“Sentencing Commission” or “Commission”) on the grounds that they are unconstitutional and contravene Congress’ statutory intent. We, the United States District Court Judges for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting en banc, having fully reviewed the briefs submitted by defendants, the Department of Justice, and the Commission, 1 having heard…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. United States v. BogleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. WeidnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  4. United States v. SwappDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1988
  5. United States v. EastlandDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API