Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 2, 2014No. Consol. 13-00069Published
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 14- 51 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THE TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff, .v. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge UNITED STATES, Consol. Court No. 13-00069 Defendant, CHANGSHAN PEER BEARING CO., LTD. and PEER BEARING COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenors. OPINION [Commerce’s amended final results in antidumping duty review sustained regarding Commerce’s targeted dumping analysis and remanded for Commerce to reexamine alleged currency conversion error.] Dated: May 2, 2014 William A. Fennell, Terence P. Stewart, and Stephanie M. Bell, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, for plaintiff.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.