Legal Opinion

Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 10, 1962No. 66357; protests 59/29912 and 59/29913 (Minneapolis)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Decision adverse to plaintiff was entered in these two protests. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 177, C.D. 2254. Plaintiff thereafter moved for rehearing and the rehearing was ordered.

The merchandise is horsemeat; in part, decharaeterized horsemeat, which the court held to be a nonenumerated manufactured article under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930; and, in part, nondecharacterized horsemeat, which the court held to be meat, not specially provided for, under paragraph 706.

Plaintiff has now amended the protests, claiming that this horsemeat is free…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lorraine Fibre Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API