Legal Opinion
McCarter v. Beckwith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
The three plaintiffs and defendant Beckwith own adjacent valuable residential properties at the southerly end of New Rochelle in a section known as Davenport Neck. Beckwith’s property is at the extremity of-Davenport Neck, and on its southerly side is lapped by the waters of Long Island sound. By artificial means he transformed the mud flats into a beach. He leased the parcel to the defendant club for $6,000 a season. The club sold five-dollar season tickets to its members for the use of the beach property. It also sold individual tickets for twenty-five cents each to those without a season…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Town of Islip v. F. E. Summers Coal & Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- City of New Rochelle v. BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by12 opinions
- Town of Huntington v. Park Shore Country Day Camp of Dix Hills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Lutheran High School Conference v. SinarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Tice v. Borough of Woodcliff LakeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Scotch Plains Tp. v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.