Legal Opinion
Tice v. Borough of Woodcliff Lake
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 13, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 N.J. Super. 20 (1951)
78 A.2d 825
ROY H. TICE AND FRANK H. TICE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 29, 1951.
Decided February 13, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. G.W.C. McCarter argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Freeman & Kroner, attorneys).
Mr. Horace F. Banta argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Winne & Banta, attorneys. Mr. Edward G. Evertz, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Solomon v. GoldbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Drennen v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- McCarter v. BeckwithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Thayer v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Concord Garden Apartments v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- City of Boynton Beach v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Hohl v. Township of ReadingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Popular Refreshments, Inc. v. Fuller's Milk BarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.