Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Commissioners of East Lake Fork Special Drainage District

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

This is an action 'at law, by appellee, against appellant, brought under the provisions of section 72 of the Drainage act of 1885, to recover special assessments made against its railroad, under section 40 of that act. The declaration avers, in substance, that plaintiff, being then a duly organized special drainage district under the provisions of said act, through which the railroad of the defendant passed, and said commissioners being of the opinion that said railroad would be benefited by the work in the district, assessed the defendant such sums as would be just and equitable for it to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craw v. Village of TolonoIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Commissioners of Highways v. Commissioners of East Lake Fork Special Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. City of Virginia v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wabash Eastern Railway Co. v. Commissioners of East Lake Fork Special Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Town of Clayton v. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Richland CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Drainage Commissioners of District No. 3 v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API