Commonwealth v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
In a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of robbery, and one count each of criminal conspiracy and prohibited offensive weapons. After denial of post-verdict motions, defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of seven to twenty years on the robbery counts, with a concurrent one to two years for criminal conspiracy. In this appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial judge abused his discretion under Commonwealth v. Bighum, 452 Pa. 554, 307 A.2d 255 (1973), by allowing admission of his eight-year-old retail theft conviction and his seven-year-old robbery conviction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DombrauskasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. CorreaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.