Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1986No. 03213PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

In a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of robbery, and one count each of criminal conspiracy and prohibited offensive weapons. After denial of post-verdict motions, defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of seven to twenty years on the robbery counts, with a concurrent one to two years for criminal conspiracy. In this appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial judge abused his discretion under Commonwealth v. Bighum, 452 Pa. 554, 307 A.2d 255 (1973), by allowing admission of his eight-year-old retail theft conviction and his seven-year-old robbery conviction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. DombrauskasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. CorreaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API