Legal Opinion

Enns v. Zayre Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1994No. 9321SC1091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

I

We first address defendant’s cross-assignment of error to the trial court’s conclusion as a matter of law that plaintiff’s objection to the submission of contributory negligence is the equivalent of a motion for directed verdict. We agree with defendant.

Motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdict are based on N.C.R. Civ. P. 50(b)(1), which states that “a party who has moved for a directed verdict may move to have the verdict and any judgment entered thereon set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict[.]” Clearly, from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Parker v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Burchette v. LynchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API