Enns v. Zayre Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
I
We first address defendant’s cross-assignment of error to the trial court’s conclusion as a matter of law that plaintiff’s objection to the submission of contributory negligence is the equivalent of a motion for directed verdict. We agree with defendant.
Motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdict are based on N.C.R. Civ. P. 50(b)(1), which states that “a party who has moved for a directed verdict may move to have the verdict and any judgment entered thereon set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict[.]” Clearly, from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Parker v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Burchette v. LynchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997