Legal Opinion · Dissent

Betor v. National Biscuit Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1929No. 6,455Published

1Dissent

ASSOCIATE JUSTICES FORD and ANGSTMAN:

We dissent. Under our statute which provides for compensation to a major dependent “to the extent of such dependency” one partially dependent on the deceased is entitled to compensation. This court recognized this rule in Edwards v. Butte & Superior Mining Co., 83 Mont. 122, 270 Pac. 634.

Mrs. Betor testified that ■ deceased contributed to her about forty dollars per month in cash, which she used to buy “clothing and grub”; the record indicates that some contributions had been made for five or six years. This was corroborated by her husband, father of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In re CarrollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ogden City v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API