Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Bartle

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1325 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Department of Transportation (DOT) appeals a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County which sustained the appeal of Arthur Bartle from the suspension of his .automobile operator’s license.

Bartle was involved in an automobile accident. He was asked to submit to a breathalyzer test. The breathalyzer machine malfunctioned and he was asked to take a blood test. He refused because he feared needles. Bartle contends his refusal to take a blood test did not constitute a refusal for license privilege suspension purposes because, under the…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. McCullough v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Binder v. Commonwealth of Pa.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Wenger v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. CurranCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API