Legal Opinion
Whittle v. Munshower
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 1, 1966No. [No. 66, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
The appellant filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the Superintendent of the Maryland State Police, to which a demurrer was filed. The court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend, but the record does not show the entry of any final judgment. For this reason, the appeal must be dismissed as premature. See Surrey Inn, Inc. v. Jennings, 215 Md. 446, 455; Martin G. Imbach, Inc. v. Dee gan, 208 Md. 115, 119; Penny v. Md. State Police, 186 Md. 10; and cases therein cited. In Walter v. Montgomery County, 179 Md. 665 and Watts v. Port Deposit, 46 Md. 500, the rule as to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brack v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Buchholtz v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Pressman v. ElginCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Martin G. Imbach, Inc. v. DeeganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Veney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- News & Observer Publishing Co. v. State Ex Rel. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Board of Education v. Secretary of PersonnelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.