Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Coryell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1912No. Docket No. 128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Bill by Mary A. Stephens against Myron E. Coryell and Guy Wickham for reformation of a written instrument. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The complainant filed her bill of complaint to correct and reform a certain contract, so as to truly represent and set forth the true contract and understanding between the parties, thereby changing the same from a land contract to a lease with the option of purchase, and providing for a yearly rental of $250.

Complainant states that the contract actually made with defendant Coryell was for the lease and purchase of a certain farm, upon the following terms and conditions: That she leased said real estate to said defendant for a period of three years at an annual rental of $250, with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Van HusanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Howell v. MedlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hamaker v. CoonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Seligman v. Estate of Ten EyckMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Edson v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. BussardMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Peterson v. PolomsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Crumrine v. BernsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Quail v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API